Rodney Dangerfield of spreadsheets
By Juice Alumni
January 15, 2007
Find more about:
excel
Poor old Mac Excel, it just don't get no respect.
It's different enough from PC Excel to strike uncanny valley fears into the unwitting. The next versions will exclude built-in VBA much to the chagrin of the Mac business faithful. The uproar reminds me of when Lotus announced it would pull LotusScript, a VBA-like language, out of its Notes program. People were openly revolting (although nothing was quite as revolting as Notes development).
So, if you don't have Parallels or the like, it's pretty much the only choice you've got on OS X. Sure, you can use Open Office, but that comes with its own peculiarities and incompatibilities.
One tip I'd like to share is how to silence this much maligned program. If you're using anything other than the built-in speakers on your Mac, you'll find that people in other parts of the office tend to jump out of their chairs when you hit Save. Mac Excel blings, clicks, and whirs with wild abandon.

You're just one click away from the sound of silence and passing this along is almost always met with "oh, you can do that?" squeaks of delight.





6 comments | Show all comments only the last 5 are shown
Miguel Marcos said:
I wouldn't put down OpenOffice as a decent alternative (actually, NeoOffice, based on OpenOffice, is the best).
At work I depend on Offce2000 (especially Excel) and SQL Server 2000. VBA work is a huge part of my livelihood. So I know quite well what's missing from the Mac version. I also believe it was a mistake to remove VBA. However, given that fact, NeoOffice is quite a nice alternative on its own with a strong level of compatibilty with Microsoft Office. If you add zero cost of ownership then it becomes quite attractive. I have Parallels on my Mac at home but if any Mac owner were to ask me about this issue I'd point them to NeoOffice first.
Rob Fay said:
That's a shame since I use a Mac at home. There is an alternative, however, to purchasing Parallels and a copy of Windows - Mac users can bypass purchasing Windows by purchasing <a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/" rel="nofollow">CrossOver</a> and a copy of Excel.
Jules said:
Thanks, Miguel. I had one of those 'ho hum' feelings about NeoOffice in the 1.x line. It was a little too slow to be usable for my needs. Perhaps I need to download the 2.x version and see where it's heading. The <a href="http://www.neooffice.org/" rel="nofollow">Web site</a> claims "Open XML and VBA Macro support in Q1 2007" so it's certainly worth a peek.
Given Novel's input into NeoOffice and their recent deal with Microsoft perhaps this might just have legs.
Jules said:
Good point, Rob. My primary, pre-OS X laptop used to be a Thinkpad so I'm familiar with CrossOver and <a href="http://www.winehq.com/" rel="nofollow">Wine</a>. Stability was a major issue even a few years ago so I'm guessing CrossOver has made strides if you're recommending it.
How well does it play with OLE, um, I mean COM... no, DCOM? Uh, COM+? What are they calling it this week?
Rob Fay said:
Actually, I cannot vouch for its goodness since I have not yet upgraded to an Intel-based Mac. However, the CrossOver site has user-supplied ratings concerning how well some pc software plays on the Mac using this tool...
George said:
Codeweavers just released version 7.0 of Crossover for the Mac, but I'm disappointed to report that running Excel 2003 VBA macros is still problematic. It may be that Excel 2007 is better supported. I do not own Excel 2007 so, short of purchasing it, I will have to rely on the comments of others to learn whether it runs without hitches under Crossover.
said:
Add a comment